BUD KEY, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Kulling v. State, 827 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
  …ssion of each witness’ testimony. However, because Kulling renewed his objections to the testimony minutes before it was admitted, the issue is preserved for review. See Fincke v. Peeples, 476 So. 2d 1319, 1322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Holmes v. Mernah, 427 So. 2d 378, 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The trial court’s decision to admit Williams rule evidence is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Chandler v. State, 702 So. 2d 186, 195 (Fla.1997). In Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654, 659-60 (Fla.1959), the Florida Sup…
• Lewis v. State, 623 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  ….S. -, 113 S.Ct. 3005, 125 L.Ed.2d 697 (1993); Crespo v. State, 379 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1111 (Fla.1980); German v. State, 379 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.1980); cf. Holmes v. Mernah, 427 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (motion in limine denied immediately before witness testified and thus no waiver from lack of subsequent objection). When the coin is turned over — i.e., when a pretrial motion in limine is granted but the proponent of the evide…
• Mabel A. Fincke, R.N. v. Peeples, 476 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …rruled the motion in limine, he might now sustain the objection if it is made, but he cannot be left to guess that a generally phrased pre-trial objection is still valid in the shifting pattern of the actual trial. Id. at 804. In Holmes v. Mernah, 427 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), appellant sought to have testimony excluded by way of an oral motion in limine “made very early in the trial while the jury was excused and before either party testified upon the issue of privilege.” Id. at 379. This court held…

Authorities Cited

• McCLOUD v. State, 335 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1976)