GARY S. COLEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
SHARON L. COLEMAN, APPELLEE
GARY S. COLEMAN, APPELLANT,
SHARON L. COLEMAN, APPELLEE
427 So. 2d 399
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record we have concluded that there is substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s determination of the value of the marital domicile and, accordingly, we affirm the court’s award, 404 So. 2d 751, predicated on that determination.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dolan Darling v. State, 808 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2002)…serted, “I think I can save the court some time. The evidence speaks for itself. We rest.” The trial court concluded that this did not constitute final argument on the part of the state, and the district court affirmed. We agree. In Menard v. State, 427 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, denied, 434 So. 2d 888 (1983), the fourth district court, when faced with a similar situation, stated: Every now and again, in the tragic world of criminal appeals, comes a case that brings involuntary smile to otherwise grim…
-
Dean v. State, 478 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1985)…serted, “I think I can save the court some time. The evidence speaks for itself. We rest.” The trial court concluded that this did not constitute final argument on the part of the state, and the district court affirmed. We agree. In Menard v. State, 427 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 434 So. 2d 888 (1983), the fourth district court, when faced with a similar situation, stated: Every now and again, in the tragic world of criminal appeals, comes a case that brings involuntary smile to otherwise grim…
-
Dean v. State, 430 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…aiver addressed to the court [‘T think I can save the court some time. The evidence speaks for itself. We rest.”] cannot legitimately be construed, as urged, as an indirect jury argument which required a rebuttal by defense counsel. Menard v. State, 427 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Even if we were to construe the state’s waiver as an oblique one sentence jury argument, the error, if any, in not allowing a reply to so fleeting a comment can hardly be considered a reversible error. See Palmes v. State, 397 S…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Coleman v. Coleman, 404 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)