THOMAS SHORTER, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ramer v. State, 530 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 1988)
  …e circumstances under which the provisions for bonds and sureties, etc., of section 30.09 are not applicable. Such exceptions do not restrict the activities of a special deputy solely to those listed,” 501 So. 2d at 53, relying on State v. Campbell, 427 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). As to the second point, the district court found “the agent’s conduct in obtaining the confidential VIN did not, under the facts of this particular case, violate constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizu…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Ramer, 501 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …) through (g) merely list the circumstances under which the provisions for bonds and sureties etc. of section 30.09 are not applicable. Such exceptions do not restrict the activities of a special deputy solely to those listed. See State v. Campbell, 427 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Another aspect of this cause centers on a police agent who crawled under the stolen vehicle to obtain the confidential VIN (vehicle identification number). The trial judge, in the case before us, did not, at the time he ruled th…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Dunmann, 427 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1983)