HELENE CURTIS INDUSTRIES, INC., AND HELENE CURTIS SALES, INC., PLAINTIFFS, C. V. LAYDEN, DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHWESTERN BEAUTY PRODUCTS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENER,
v.
SALES AFFILIATES, INC., DEFENDANT; THE GILLETTE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, SKILLERN & SONS, INC., AND WALGREEN DRUG COMPANY OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENERS, V. SALES AFFILIATES, INC., DEFENDANT; SALES AFFILIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, INVOLUNTARY PLAINTIFF, V. C. V. LAYDEN, DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHWESTERN BEAUTY PRODUCTS COMPANY, DEFENDANT; SALES AFFILIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, INVOLUNTARY PLAINTIFF, V. SKILLERN & SONS, INC., AND WALGREEN DRUG COMPANY OF TEXAS, AND THE GILLETTE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS
HELENE CURTIS INDUSTRIES, INC., AND HELENE CURTIS SALES, INC., PLAINTIFFS, C. V. LAYDEN, DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHWESTERN BEAUTY PRODUCTS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENER,
SALES AFFILIATES, INC., DEFENDANT; THE GILLETTE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, SKILLERN & SONS, INC., AND WALGREEN DRUG COMPANY OF TEXAS, PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENERS, V. SALES AFFILIATES, INC., DEFENDANT; SALES AFFILIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, INVOLUNTARY PLAINTIFF, V. C. V. LAYDEN, DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHWESTERN BEAUTY PRODUCTS COMPANY, DEFENDANT; SALES AFFILIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, INVOLUNTARY PLAINTIFF, V. SKILLERN & SONS, INC., AND WALGREEN DRUG COMPANY OF TEXAS, AND THE GILLETTE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS
254 F.2d 470
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
HINCKS and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.
The motion to recall the mandate and clarify the opinion and judgment is denied, the moving party to pay the costs of printing the plaintiffs’ brief. There is no merit whatsoever to the contention of the defendant Sales Affiliates, Inc. Judge Kaufman, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 582, has correctly interpreted our opinion and it needs no clarification. This is the second such motion to delay the proceedings. It is desirable that the District Court proceed forthwith in accordance with our opinion, 247 F. 2d 940, filed on September 5, 1957.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tidewater Patent Dev. Co. v. Kitchen, 371 F.2d 1004 (4th Cir. 1966)
-
Tidewater Patent Dev. Co. v. Gillette Co., 273 F.2d 936 (4th Cir. 1959)
Authorities Cited
- Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Layden, 247 F.2d 940 (2d Cir. 1957)