DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PETITIONER,
v.
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION, RESPONDENT

D.C. Cir. | 1958-04-17
No. 14128
254 F.2d 955 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Under the District of Columbia Code, real property exempt from taxation includes “Buildings belonging to and used in carrying on the purposes and activities of” several named organizations, including the Brookings Institution. D.C.Code (1951) § 47-801a(k). Section 47-801a(r) (1) exempts from taxation “Grounds belonging to and reasonably required and actually used for the carrying on of the activities and purposes” of these organizations.

The Brookings Institution owns the house in which its President lives. He is expected to use the house for the Institution’s purposes. He does some official work there, although his office is not there. He pays no rent. We think the District of Columbia Tax Court was right in ruling that the house and its yard are not subject to tax. Many cases, including e. g. Wheaton College v. Town of Norton, 232 Mass. 141, 122 N.E. 280, give support to this view. Cf. District of Columbia v. George Washington University, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 214, 221 F. 2d 87; District of Columbia v. Church of the Pilgrims, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 68, 247 F. 2d 59.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw