ORAN JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
NATHAN MAYO, AS CUSTODIAN OF THE FLORIDA STATE PRISON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal because a certificate of probable cause was not granted.
Appellant, a state prisoner, sought habeas corpus relief in the district court, which was denied. The district court also denied a certificate of prob…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Executive Clemency cases and more on FLexlaw
CAMERON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Oran Johnson, petitioner below, a prisoner in custody under a State Court sentence, sought in the court below habeas corpus relief therefrom. The District Judge held two hearings on the petition and denied it, granting appellant, however, leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but denying a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S. C.A. § 2253. No application having been made to a member of this Court for a certificate of probable cause, this Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
In an effort to be certain that appellant, who is serving a life sentence, should be given every possible chance to present his contentions, this Court requested a member of the Florida Bar of outstanding ability to present this appeal to us, and this was done by extended oral argument. In addition, the Attorney General of Florida has filed a brief painstakingly setting forth each of the questions raised by appellant, and answering each of said questions in a fair and unbiased manner. We have considered the record and the arguments of counsel as if they were placed before us upon an application for a certificate of probable cause. Cf. Franey v. State of Florida, 5 Cir., 1944, 211 F. 2d 447; Henson v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1954, 217 F. 2d 134; Maulding v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1954, 217 F. 2d 134; and Atkins v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1955, 227 F. 2d 161. Our consideration leads us to the conclusion that there is no merit in any of appellant’s contentions.
From the attitude of the representatives of the State of Florida in the presentation of the case to us, we are confident that the way has been, and will remain, open for appellant to avail himself of the provisions of the Florida law dealing with executive clemency. F.S.A. § 940.01 et seq.
None of the Judges of this Court being willing to issue a certificate of probable cause, the appeal is
Dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fitzsimmons v. Yeager, 391 F.2d 849 (3d Cir. 1968)
-
Klier v. Louie L. Wainwright, 464 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Madison v. Tahash, 359 F.2d 60 (8th Cir. 1966)
Authorities Cited
- Franey v. State, 211 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1954)
- Atkins v. Ellis, 227 F.2d 161 (5th Cir. 1955)
- Henson v. Ellis, 217 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1954)
- Maulding v. Ellis, 217 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1954)