MARGOT VON OPEL, APPELLANT,
v.
FRITZ VON OPEL, APPELLEE
MARGOT VON OPEL, APPELLANT,
FRITZ VON OPEL, APPELLEE
257 F.2d 666
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1958)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant sued in the District of Columbia to enforce a judgment obtained against appellee in New York. It is not enforcible here as a money judgment, because appellee was not a resi dent of New York and was not personally served with process there. Stock certificates that had been vested by the Alien Property Custodian, and were in New York, are now in the District of Columbia. But vested property cannot be reached by attachment or execution. Von Opel v. Uebersee Finanz Korporation, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 225 F. 2d 530.
In declining to permit amendment of •appellant’s complaint, the District Court did not abuse its discretion.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Margot von Opel v. Uebersee Finanz Korporation, 225 F.2d 530 (D.C. Cir. 1955)