CLIFFORD DEAN, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Dupont, 659 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …ning must cease. Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975). Following an equivocal request to remain silent, police may only question a suspect to clarify the invocation of the right to remain silent. In State v. Wininger, 427 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), the defendant volunteered to answer questions at the police station. When the police told Wininger that he was a suspect, he indicated that he wanted to go home. The police continued questioning Wininger. The Wininger court held…
• Stokes v. State, 541 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …cribed, affect the obligation of the officers to limit inquiry at that point to a clarification of any doubt presented by the request, which was uttered in their presence and in response to their interroga [*646] tion.1 As held in State v. Wininger, 427 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), where the statement from defendant in the course of interrogation was “I want to go home,” we conclude that: ... the sole issue before us is whether the defendant’s words ... indicated in any manner that the defendant wished to…
• State v. McINTYRE, 463 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Smith v. Illinois, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 490, 83 L.Ed.2d 488 (1984); DeConingh v. State, 433 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 104 S.Ct. 995, 79 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); State v. Wininger, 427 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Echevarria, 422 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), pet. for rev. denied, 434 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1983).…

Authorities Cited

• C. E., Jr. v. State, 342 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)