JAMES CRAWFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
RALPH GAJEWSKI, JOSEPH KING, STANLEY VIEIULIS, JOSEPH AREEDA, ROBERT SLOTTKE, RICHARD O'CONNELL, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the appellant's application for leave to appeal and leave to appeal in forma pauperis.
Appellant filed an application for leave to appeal a dismissal of his civil rights action by the District Court. The District Court had previously den…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant has filed in this Court on October 22, 1958, an “Application for leave to appeal in the nature of Mandamus, and Certiorari,” from which it appears that he challenges the correctness of orders entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on August 28, 1958, and September 6, 1958, dismissing his action in that Court against several defendants for damages on account of alleged violation of his civil rights. It is accompanied by an application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, a similar application having been previously denied by the District Judge for the reason that the appeal was without merit and not taken in good faith.