JAMES THOMAS LANCIA, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jenkins v. State, 586 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …he testified that based upon an examination of her notes, the transcript of the deposition was correct. Because the relevant portions of the deposition were read to the jury, the remainder of the deposition was properly excluded. Cf. Hills v. State, 428 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (trial court erred in playing entire tape recording of grand jury testimony where only short segments necessary to show witness’ prior inconsistent statements). Furthermore, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of defend…
• Fidelia Alexander v. Bird Rd. Ranch & Stables, Inc., 599 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …t was not proper impeachment of his earlier statements. See Fogel v. Mirmelli, 413 So. 2d 1204, 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); C. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 608.4 (1992 Ed.); see also Jenkins v. State, 586 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Hills v. State, 428 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see generally Smith v. State, 573 So. 2d 306, 313 (Fla.1990); Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Ctr., Inc. v. Meeks, 560 So. 2d 778, 781 (Fla.1990) (“Generally, a witness may be impeached by evidence of statements inconsiste…
• Diamond v. State, 436 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …t from the prior law exemplified by Perry, so that, contrary to the ruling below, Hengst’s prior statement under oath is admissible as substantive evidence in the defendant’s favor. State v. Moore, 424 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Hills v. State, 428 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Law Revision Council Note, 6C F.S.A. 238-39 (1976); see California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970); see also, State v. Freber, 366 So. 2d 426 (Fla.1978). Since, by its terms, Sec. 90.801(2)(a) is ap…

Authorities Cited

• Thomas v. State, 374 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1979)