ARTHUR M. PARKER, JR., AND TOM K. WHEELER, APPELLANTS,
v.
LOUISE O. WELLBORN, APPELLEE
ARTHUR M. PARKER, JR., AND TOM K. WHEELER, APPELLANTS,
LOUISE O. WELLBORN, APPELLEE
261 F.2d 767
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants sued to reform a contract under which they had given appellee a series of notes. She filed a counterclaim on those notes which had become due and was given judgment thereon, although the issues as to reformation had not been reached. The court expressly determined, however, in accordance with Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 there was no just reason for delay as to the counterclaim. This appeal is from the judgment awarded on the matured notes.
The claims of the appellants remain undetermined, and are not affected by the judgment on the counterclaim. We find no error. Affirmed.
. 28 U.S.C.A.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Powell v. Zuckert, 366 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
-
Rasmussen v. The United States, 543 F.2d 134 (Ct. Cl. 1976)
-
Hondros v. United States Civil Serv. Comm'n & United States Civil Serv. Comm'rs, 720 F.2d 278 (3d Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence