ARMOUR & COMPANY, LIBELANT-APPELLEE,
v.
COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE NAVEGACION DODERO, S.A., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
ARMOUR & COMPANY, LIBELANT-APPELLEE,
COMPANIA ARGENTINA DE NAVEGACION DODERO, S.A., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
263 F.2d 323
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1959)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20; A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F. 2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F. 2d 147, 149; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F. 2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McALLISTER v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1954)
- In re Disbarment of Isserman, 348 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1954)
- Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia & Italia Societa Anonima Di Navigazione, 226 F.2d 147 (2d Cir. 1955)
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 200 F.2d 908 (2d Cir. 1953)
- A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. THE Exanthia & its owner, 234 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1956)