PRESS WIRELEES, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS, AMERICAN CABLE & RADIO CORPORATION, ALL AMERICA CABLES & RADIO, INC., THE COMMERCIAL CABLE COMPANY, MACKAY RADIO & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, AND RCA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., INTERVENORS
PRESS WIRELEES, INC., PETITIONER,
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS, AMERICAN CABLE & RADIO CORPORATION, ALL AMERICA CABLES & RADIO, INC., THE COMMERCIAL CABLE COMPANY, MACKAY RADIO & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, AND RCA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., INTERVENORS
264 F.2d 372
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Commission declined to file what petitioner called a tariff. The Commission thought the tariff covered services petitioner was not licensed to perform. We find no error. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968)
-
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
-
United States v. Johnson, 431 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence