ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, ET AL., APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Administration Discretion cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s summary denial 1 of appellant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus2 because appellant has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to Section 33-3.07, Florida Administrative Code, prior to seeking extraordinary relief. This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to exhaust available administrative remedies.
BOOTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur. . The trial court denied the petition as without merit and on the ground that “[t]he prison administration has, and should have, wide discretion in the place of confinement within the institution of all inmates in their custody for their protection and safety as well as the orderly administration of the institution.”
. Petitioner alleged that he was denied due process and a fair hearing pertaining to his transfer from genéral population to administrative confinement at Florida State Prison, where he was placed in Close Management I confinement.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Griggs v. Louie L. Wainwright, 473 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…petitioner challenging his administrative confinement status must first exhaust his administrative [*50] remedies by way of rule 33-3.07, Florida Administrative Code, the Department of Corrections’ inmate grievance procedure. Williams v. Wainwright, 428 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).1 This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to exhaust available administrative remedies. BOOTH, C.J., and BARFIELD, J., concur. . Appellant relies in part on this Court's decision in Granger v. Florida State…
-
Brown v. R.L. Duggar, 471 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Williams v. Wainwright, 428 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). ERVIN, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.…
-
Cajuste v. State, 99 So. 3d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…ant must first exhaust his administrative remedies before he may seek judicial review of this claim. See, e.g., Sutton v. Strickland, 485 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Griggs v. Wainwright, 473 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Williams v. Wainwright, 428 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We express no opinion on the underlying merits of Defendant’s claim. Affirmed without prejudice to Defendant’s right to seek administrative remedies. . The term "sentence” is defined as “the pronouncement by the court of th…