HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
JONES, Circuit Judge.
This is a companion case to the four cases decided today which are styled Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F. 2d 222; Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F. 2d 232; Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F. 2d 234; and Richardson v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F. 2d 233.
The facts in this case are not different in any material respect from those in Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, supra. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case, the orders of the Federal Power Commission are
Affirmed.
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge
(dis-
senting) .
For dissenting opinion see Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 1959, 266 F. 2d 222, 227.
Rehearing denied:
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SUN OIL Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1959)
-
Richardson v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1959)
-
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1959)
Authorities Cited
- SUN OIL Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1959)
- Hunt OIL Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 232 (5th Cir. 1959)
- Richardson v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 233 (5th Cir. 1959)
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 266 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1959)