MILTON S. KOBLITZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
MILTON S. KOBLITZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
266 F.2d 320
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*321] PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the opinion of Judge Bryan, reported at 164 F.Supp. 367. In addition to the estoppel of the former judgment we find that the basic point now argued as to whether the source of appellant’s claim is derivative or direct, was determined in the appeal to this Court from the adverse judgment in the prior action. Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 2 Cir., 1955, 228 F. 2d 563. Thus appellant is bound not only by a direct but also by a collateral estoppel.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Merovka v. Renwick L. Allen and Courtney Vallentine, 410 F.2d 1307 (10th Cir. 1969)
Authorities Cited
- Norvin Rieser v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 228 F.2d 563 (2d Cir. 1955)