LEO O. JOHNSON, AN INDIVIDUAL DOING BUSINESS AS JOHNSON HAIR AND SCALP CLINIC, PETITIONER,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
LEO O. JOHNSON, AN INDIVIDUAL DOING BUSINESS AS JOHNSON HAIR AND SCALP CLINIC, PETITIONER,
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
266 F.2d 560
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find no such differences in fact as distinguish this case from Mueller v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F. 2d 443. We adhere to the doctrines there announced. The order of the Commission is affirmed and will be enforced.
Affirmed.
Dissent
CAMERON, Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
Rehearing denied; CAMERON, Circuit Judge, dissenting.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Keele Hair & Scalp Specialists, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 275 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1960)
-
Voss v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 275 F.2d 24 (5th Cir. 1960)
Authorities Cited
- Mueller v. United States, 262 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1958)