HUGH A. DAY, III, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, APPELLEE; HUGH A. DAY, III, ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. DR. ASAM DANI ET AL., APPELLEES

D.C. Cir. | 1959-04-16
Nos. 14564, 14565
Before Mr. Justice Burton, retired, and Wilbur K. Miller and Washington, Circuit Judges.
266 F.2d 689 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals from judgments of the District Court in a medical malpractice case, directing verdicts for defendants-appellees at the close of the evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights. In particular, we note that there was no adequate showing by the plaintiff that the allegedly negligent conduct on the part of appellees was the cause of the condition from which plaintiff now suffers. Cf. Kasmer v. Sternal, 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 165 F. 2d 624; Hall v. United States, D.C.1955, 136 F.Supp. 187, affirmed, 5 Cir., 1956, 234 F. 2d 811; Ayers v. Parry, 3 Cir., 1951, 192 F. 2d 181, certiorari denied, 1952, 343 U.S. 980, 72 S.Ct. 1081, 96 L.Ed. 1371.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw