AUDLEY R. MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AUDLEY R. MOORE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
428 So. 2d 789
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
SCHOONOVER, Judge.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in the case sub judice, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and we therefore affirm the judgment. However, the judgment and sentence, although indicating the appellant is to receive credit for “time served,” does not set forth a specific period of credit time as required by section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1981). We therefore remand to the trial court with directions that the trial judge set forth the specific period of credit time granted the appellant. Walker v. State, 397 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
Remanded for correction of judgment and sentence; otherwise affirmed.
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wicker v. State, 438 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…la. 3d DCA 1982). Additionally, although the sentences indicate the appellant is to receive credit for “time served,” they do not set forth a specific period of credit time as required by section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1981). Moore v. State, 428 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wicker. We, therefore, affirm the appellant’s convictions but strike each of the special provisions for retention of jurisdiction and remand to the trial court with directions to reconsider the period of retention in accordance…
Authorities Cited
- Walker v. State, 397 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)