ELOISE COONS AND JIM ZIMMERMAN, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND JIM ZIMMERMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,

v.

WILMER P. SHRIVER AND KATHERINE W. SHRIVER, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. Miller, 671 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …rkers who prepared the reports as well as the persons whom they interviewed nor from attempting to discredit the methods used to reach conclusions adverse to her cause. [*852] Kern v. Kern, 333 So. 2d 17, 20 (Fla.1976). See also, Landers v. Landers, 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We find no basis to exclude the GAL from examination as a witness. We also note that a trial court has less discretion in modifying a child-custody award than in entering the original decree. See Schweinberg v. Click, 627 So. 2…
• Protean Invs., Inc. v. Travel ETC., Inc., 519 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …eached by other district courts of appeal. See, e.g., Altamonte Hitch & Trailer Serv., Inc. v. U-Haul Co. of Eastern Fla., 498 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Nour v. All State Pipe Supply Co., 487 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Coons v. Shriver, 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Brown v. Gardens By the Sea South Condominium Ass’n, 424 So. 2d 181, 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). However, in light of the subsequent supreme court rulings in Cheek and Finkelstein, we question the continuing validity of the foregoin…
• Hunt v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 444 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …as associated himself with the project and that he may not relieve himself of responsibility by saying that he was one of several qualifying agents who could have supervised the construction. See also Stoner v. Department of Professional Regulation, 429 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We therefore hold that the final order correctly held appellant Hunt was responsible for the failure to supervise the construction and the deliberate violation of the applicable building code. Appellant Hunt’s second and third…