RAYMOND RAMOS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Deguster Blake Zeigler v. State, 471 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …issue originally briefed is dispositive. Appellee suggests that the question of whether an issue preserved for review upon a nolo contendere plea is dispositive is jurisdictional, and hence a proper subject for review here, citing Turner v. State, 429 So. 2d 318, 319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In Turner, however, on rehearing we receded from language in our original opinion in [*176] which we indicated that an appellate court could determine for itself whether an issue stipulated by the parties as being disposi-t…
• Rivera v. State, 547 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …dant’s will and produce confession).2 MIRANDA WARNINGS Rivera claims that he was entitled to be specifically re-advised of his Miranda rights before submitting to the polygraph examination. He cites as support for this proposition Turner v. State, 429 So. 2d 318 (Pla. 1st DCA 1982), rev. denied, 440 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1983), where the court stated that any incriminating statements made by the defendant during a polygraph examination, in the absence of Miranda warnings, were inadmissible, as the defendant was…
• Weber v. State, 492 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …ate, 402 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hardison v. State, 385 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Arnold v. State, 379 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). The only case unearthed by this court’s research which actually reached the merits is Turner v. State, 429 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), where the court affirmed the lower court’s judgment and sentence although it found that the lower court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress his confession was not dispositive. The Turner court stated that consideration of…