PACIFIC GAMBLE ROBINSON CO., A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1959-06-30
No. 15818
Before POPE, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS, FEE, CHAMBERS, BARNES, HAMLEY, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.
270 F.2d 35 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Payments made by draft on a United States bank, but delivered in Canada, are not considered payments made 'within the United States' as a matter of law.


Facts & Procedural History

The case involves shipments paid for by draft on a US bank, with delivery occurring in Canada. The Court of Claims previously held such payments were …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion in Fisher Flouring Mills Company v. United States, 9 Cir., 270 F. 2d 27, is adopted as the opinion of the Court in this case.

Since the bulk of the shipments in controversy in the instant case were paid for by draft on a bank in the United States, although delivery thereof was made in Canada, we hold such payments were not as a matter of law made “within the United States.” The established commercial usage of this country and Canada is that these payments were made in Canada whether the banks upon which the drafts were drawn were situate in that country or this. Unquestionably, the actual intent of both the shipper and the railroad conformed thereto. The Court of Claims, by a divided court, held the opposite in Kellogg Company v. United States, 133 F.Supp. 387, 132 Ct.Cl. 507. The Supreme Court denied certiorari.

We have been admonished that denial of certiorari does not indicate a leaning one way or the other as to the questions involved in the opinion sought to be reviewed. The determination of the Court of Claims might have been upon the facts. There is no such finding of fact in the ease before us.

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw