EDWARD O. MUELLER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, AND WILLIAM R. SCHMITZ, DEFENDANTS
EDWARD O. MUELLER, PLAINTIFF,
RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, AND WILLIAM R. SCHMITZ, DEFENDANTS
271 F.2d 591
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en bcmc. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Costas Hadjipateras v. Pacifica, 290 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1961)
-
United States v. Dante Edward Gori, 282 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1960)
-
Walters v. Moore-McCORMACK Lines, Inc., 312 F.2d 893 (2d Cir. 1963)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence