JACKSON TILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was substantial evidence to support the National Labor Relations Board's findings of unfair labor practices.
The National Labor Relations Board found that Jackson Tile Manufacturing Company engaged in unfair labor practices, including surveillance, interrogat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Section 8(A)(3) Of The Nlra cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This case is before the Court on the petition of Jackson Tile Manufacturing Company to review and set aside a cease and desist order of the National Labor Relations Board following proceedings under Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act. 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.
The Board found that the Jackson Tile Manufacturing Company violated Section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.) by resorting to an informer system, surveillance of union meetings, interrogation of employees, and other forms of coercion designed to prevent the employees from exercising the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act; that it violated Section 8(a) (1) by discharging a supervisor who became reluctant to commit further unfair labor practices; and that it violated Section 8(a) (3) and 8(a) (1) by discriminatorily discharging four employees because of their organizing activities for the Union. 122 NLRB No.
94. The Board requests enforcement of its order. The only issues presented by this appeal are factual ones. We have carefully reviewed the record as a whole and find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings that the Company violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act. Universal Camera Corp. v.
N. L.
R. B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456; N.
L. R. B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F. 2d 2; N.
L. R. B. v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 5 Cir., 1956, 231 F. 2d 567. The Company’s petition to review and set aside the order is denied.
Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 380 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1967)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, Local 925, AFL-CIO, 460 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Comfort, Inc., 365 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1966)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1951)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Birmingham Publ'g Co., 262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1958)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Coats & Clark, 231 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1956)