WALTER W. KRANTZ, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD W. VAN DETTE AND VIRGIL P. VAN DETTE, APPELLEES

6th Cir. | 1959-12-19
No. 13801
272 F.2d 709 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

After a comprehensive trial in the district court, the complaint of the appellant-inventor, asking recovery against appellees of royalties under three license agreements, was dismissed. From the order of dismissal, this appeal is taken and has been heard and duly considered upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys and upon the record in the case.

Judge Weick, the trial judge, now a member of this court, wrote an opinion carefully discussing the pertinent issues in the case; and, in our view, correctly deciding them.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reported at 165 F.Supp. 776, the order dismissing the complaint is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw