THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
BAHA SAAD, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-04-05
No. 82-2041
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
429 So. 2d 757 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida prosecuted Saad for attempted bribery after he offered $1,000 each to two police officers to secure return of $20,700 in cash seized during his arrest. The trial judge dismissed the charges on the ground that the initial seizure was unlawful and Saad was entitled to the money anyway, but the appellate court reversed, holding that bribery charges can proceed regardless of whether the underlying government action was lawful.


Holding

A defendant is guilty of bribery if he corruptly pays or offers compensation for an act, even if that act is one the bribee is legally bound to accomplish or even if the underlying government action was unlawful. The legality or illegality of the initial seizure is irrelevant to the bribery charge.


Headnotes

[1] A person is guilty of bribery if they corruptly pay or accept unlawful compensation, even for performing an act the recipient is legally bound to accomplish.

[2] The offense of bribery is committed when there is an improper agreement to influence an officer's judgment or decision, regardless of whether the outcome of that decision…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“one is guilty of bribery if he corruptly pays or accepts unlawful compensation even for doing an act that the bribee is legally bound to accomplish”

Establishes the core holding that bribery liability attaches regardless of whether the underlying act was lawful or the bribee was legally obligated to perform it

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Saad was arrested and $20,700 in cash was seized from him. Saad then attempted to deliver $1,000 each to two police officers in order to secure the re…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Saad attempted to deliver $1,000 each to two police officers to secure the return of $20,700 in cash which had been taken from him in the course of an arrest. The trial judge granted a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) motion to dismiss the resulting bribery charges, Sec. 838.015, Fla.Stat. (1981), on the ground that the initial seizure had been unlawful and that he was therefore entitled to the money in any case. We summarily reverse. Even if arguendo the premise of an illegal taking were correct, it is obvious, hornbook law, that one is guilty of bribery if he corruptly pays or accepts unlawful compensation even for doing an act that the bribee is legally bound to accomplish. 11 C.J.S. Bribery § 2(e)(4) (1938); 12 Am.Jur.2d Bribery § 12 (1964). Thus in People v. Furlong, 140 A.D. 179, 184, 125 N.Y.S. 164, 168 (1910), aff’d, 201 N.Y. 511, 94 N.E. 1096 (1911), the court said:

The corruption aimed at is not simply the doing of things which may be improper in themselves, but even the doing of proper things as the result of an improper agreement. The statute would be violated as much by an agreement for compensation from private parties to take special pains to decide, even properly a matter coming before the officer, as it would by an agreement to decide it improperly. In other words, the statute reaches out as much against the influencing of the officer’s judgment or decision as it does against the improper result of such influence. The offense is so subtle in its fruits that the law endeavors to lay the ax at its very roots.

In our system at least, the end does not justify the means. The effectuation of Saad's intent to get his money by short-circuiting and subverting that system may, and must, be held accountable to the criminal law. See also, Trushin v. State, 384 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), aff’d, 425 So. 2d 1126 (Fla.1982); State v. Napoli, 373 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw