TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON-ALLENTOWN, INC., APPELLANT
v.
PAUL A. MCGINLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, COUNTY OF LEHIGH, PENNSYLVANIA. PENNSYLVANIA RETAILERS' ASSOCIATION, AMICUS CURIAE
TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON-ALLENTOWN, INC., APPELLANT
PAUL A. MCGINLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, COUNTY OF LEHIGH, PENNSYLVANIA. PENNSYLVANIA RETAILERS' ASSOCIATION, AMICUS CURIAE
273 F.2d 954
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1959)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs in this case have taken the position that they may appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States from an adverse decision by a three-judge court on the issue of the constitutionality of the statute and simultaneously appeal to the Court of Appeals on the issue of discriminatory enforcement of the statute. We think there is no basis for the allowance of a split appeal in this fashion. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal to this Court for want of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1253,1291.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Application of Rudolf Wiechert, 370 F.2d 927 (C.C.P.A. 1967)
-
Wolf v. Boyd, 287 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1961)
Authorities Cited
- TWO Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGINLEY, 266 F.2d 427 (3d Cir. 1959)