PARCEL 5099, BEING LOT 831 IN SQUARE 544, IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AND CHARLES R. GODDARD, APPELLANT,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, REDEVELOPMENT LAND AGENCY, APPELLEE
PARCEL 5099, BEING LOT 831 IN SQUARE 544, IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AND CHARLES R. GODDARD, APPELLANT,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, REDEVELOPMENT LAND AGENCY, APPELLEE
274 F.2d 753
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1960)
Caution
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is a condemnation case, in which the jury’s award is challenged by the appellant landowner. Cf. Riley v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 246 F. 2d 641 (1957). We have reviewed the record in the light of appellant’s contentions, and we find no reversible error. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (22 total)
-
Red Lion Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 395 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1969)
-
Off. OF Commc'n OF the United Church OF Christ v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 359 F.2d 994 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
-
Marine Space Enclosures, Inc. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States, 420 F.2d 577 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mayme J. Riley v. Dist. of Columbia Redev. Land Agency, 246 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1957)