DONALD YATES A/K/A JOSEPH MORGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Written Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal in this case, we find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and therefore, the judgments and sentences appealed from are affirmed. However, at sentencing in open court, the court specifically retained jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence on count I of the information filed against the appellant but did not mention jurisdiction in connection with the sentences entered on counts II, III, IV, arid V. The written judgments and sentences state that jurisdiction was retained on all counts.
Since a court’s written order of judgment and sentence must not vary from its oral pronouncement, Gatti v. State, 324 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), retention of jurisdiction must be stricken from the judgments and sentences entered in connection with counts II, III, IV, and V.
Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court to allow correction of the apparent clerical errors hereinabove mentioned.
The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (40 total)
-
LaMarcus Edward Carter v. State, 454 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…tion under Terry, which was justifiable only if the officers possessed a “founded” suspicion of the occupants’ criminal activity.1 Wilson v. State, 433 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Freeman v. State, 433 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); R.B. v. State, 429 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Perera, 412 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 419 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1982); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1981). See Terry v. Ohio; United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 65 L.Ed.2d 497 (19…
-
Cobb v. State, 511 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…defendant’s presence in front of alley in deserted area at early morning hour plus flight). Nevertheless, flight, standing alone, will not justify either such a belief or stop.1 See Wilson v. State, 433 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); R.B. v. State, 429 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); McClain v. State, 408 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Kearse v. State, 384 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Jackson v. State, 319 So. 2d 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). See also W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.3(c), at 448-51 (2d ed. 1…
-
Sherman v. State, 451 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…ation for a period of two years. However, the written order provides for a three-year period of probation. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of the apparent clerical error in the order of probation. Yates v. State, 429 So. 2d 815 (Fla.2d DCA 1983). The order is AFFIRMED in all other respects. BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 40 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gatti v. State, 324 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)