ARMANDO SIERRA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-04-19
No. 81-2366
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
429 So. 2d 832 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Judge.

[*833] FERGUSON, Judge.

Testimony that appellant had stated several days before killing his wife that,

I’m an assassin, and I would kill anyone and I would do this when I go back to Cuba,

and on another occasion, three days before the stabbing, was heard to say,

Yes, you wait and see in the newspapers you’re going to hear that I killed my wife and I killed myself,

was relevant and admissible declarations tending to establish premeditation, an essential element to first-degree murder as charged. Statements of an accused expressing an intent to kill, followed not too remotely by the act of killing, may be evidence of premeditation. See Way v. State, 418 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dino v. State, 405 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Because there is sufficient record evidence of premeditation to support the jury verdict, the conviction and sentence for first-degree murder will not be disturbed. Sireci v. State, 399 So. 2d 964 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dixon v. State, 911 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
    …made by Dixon just minutes before Williams was shot tended to prove Dixon’s premeditation. “Statements of an accused expressing an intent to kill, followed not too remotely by the act of killing, may be evidence of premeditation.” Sierra v. State, 429 So. 2d 832, 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In Sierra, the third district found both a general statement that the defendant would kill anyone and a separate statement that he would kill his wife relevant for establishing premeditation. Sierra, 429 So. 2d at 833. State…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw