CARMINE AMATO, APPELLANT,
v.
ELEANOR V. AMATO, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by a former husband from an order of contempt and for other relief sought by the former wife in post-dissolution proceedings. The order was predicated upon a special master’s hearing and report. The only point raised that we find has merit is the failure of the trial court or the special master to make a specific finding of the husband’s ability to pay in accordance with the decision in Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So. 2d 650 (Fla.1976). Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand this cause with directions that a determination be made of the husband’s ability to pay and an express finding be set out in any subsequent order of contempt based on the husband’s failure to comply with prior court orders.
ANSTEAD, BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Acosta, 439 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…is an essential witness for the defense is an in camera hearing. See United States v. Fischer, 531 F. 2d 783 (5th Cir.1976); Coby v. State, 397 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet. for review denied, 407 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 1981). See also Mingle v. State, 429 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Before suffering the ultimate sanction of dismissal for refusing to disclose an informant’s identity, the state is entitled to an in camera hearing to consider the necessity for the informant’s testimony and the state’s interest…
-
State v. Lozano, 616 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…e Transportation Authority, 558 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). The “irreparable injury” test must be satisfied in a certiorari proceeding that arises from a criminal case, as well. See Tart v. State, 96 Fla. 77, 117 So. 698 (1928); Mingle v. State, 429 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Smith v. State, 187 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). The Third District’s reversal of Lo-zano’s Dade County convictions shows that denial of a motion for change of venue, if erroneous, can be corrected on plenary appeal and a new t…
-
Eutsay v. State, 103 So. 3d 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…ial “cat out of the bag” orders), the harm done by the failure to provide information can be corrected on appeal in most cases. Jennings v. Elections Canvassing Comm’n of State of Fla., 958 So. 2d 1083, 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see Mingle v. State, 429 So. 2d 850, 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (denying a petition for writ of certiorari challenging the denial of a motion to compel disclosure of the name of a confidential informant due to the defendant’s “full, adequate and complete remedy on plenary appeal”). When…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1976)