ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
STROH BREWERY COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. KOHN, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
STROH BREWERY COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. KOHN, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
280 F.2d 424
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The .above cause coming on to be heard on an appeal from, orders denying petitions for preliminary injunctions in the above cases, and after hearing the ease upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and after due consideration of the reasons, set forth in the oral ruling of the Court denying the issuance of the preliminary injunctions, and the Court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the orders of the District Court denying preliminary injunctions in the above cases be and are hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ACE Beer Distribs., Inc. v. Kohn, Inc., 318 F.2d 283 (6th Cir. 1963)
-
Tapco Prods. Co. v. VAN Mark Prods. Corp. & Eugene Van Cleave, 446 F.2d 420 (6th Cir. 1971)
-
Stiller v. Squeez-A-Purse Corp., 296 F.2d 504 (6th Cir. 1961)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence