STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH PUMA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the dismissal of a gambling house charge, holding that the State's sworn traverse and demurrer adequately disputed the defendant's assertions regarding ownership and control of the gambling premises.
A trial court errs in granting a motion to dismiss a gambling house charge when the State files a sworn traverse and demurrer that specifically dispute the defendant's sworn assertions regarding ownership and control of the premises.
[1] A sworn traverse and demurrer by the State that specifically dispute a defendant's sworn assertions regarding essential elements of a gambling house charge preclude dismi…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJoseph Puma was charged with maintaining a gambling house. Puma moved to dismiss the information, asserting the State had no evidence of his ownership…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Demurrer cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The State appeals from an order dismissing an information which charged Joseph Puma with maintaining a gambling house.
The State’s sworn traverse specifically denied appellee’s assertion that the State had no evidence of appellee’s ownership or control interest in the gambling premises, such interest or control being one of the essential elements of maintaining a gambling house along with habitual gambling on the premises with defendant’s knowledge and consent. Ferguson v. State, 377 So. 2d 709, 710 (Fla.1979); Perlman v. State, 269 So. 2d 385, 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). The State also filed a sworn demurrer in response to appellee’s amended motion to dismiss and recited specific instances and conduct of appellee that disputed appellee’s own sworn assertions of minimal contact with the gambling premises. The trial court erred when it granted appellee’s motion to dismiss the information. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) and (d); State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So. 2d 376, 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), petition for review denied, 419 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1982); Ellis v. State, 346 So. 2d 1044, 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. denied, 352 So. 2d 175 (Fla.1977).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss and remand this cause with directions to reinstate the information and for a trial on the merits.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ellis v. State, 346 So. 2d 1044 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Ferguson v. State, 377 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 1979)
- State v. Oberholtzer, 411 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Perlman v. State, 269 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)