GEORGE TOMS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1983-04-29
No. 82-2567
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
430 So. 2d 553 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s raising the illegality of his sentence under Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1980), by way of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion filed in the trial court.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pate v. State, 547 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
    …onviction relief followed and was denied by the trial court without hearing. It was error for the trial court to deny summarily the appellant’s motion, because the record does not conclusively refute the allegations of his petition. Perez v. State, 430 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Appellant states that when he agreed to plead guilty, he did not know what “sub [*318] stantial assistance” would be required. That is borne out by the transcript of the plea hearing, when the prosecutor stated that the substanti…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw