JAMES R. LOGAN, APPELLANT
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

D.C. Cir. | 1960-11-17
No. 15883
284 F.2d 238 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that sufficient evidence of impaired mentality was presented to warrant an instruction on insanity. The court also clarified the admissibility of certain psychiatric records.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of housebreaking. He urged two grounds for reversal: the refusal to instruct the jury on insanity despite evidence of mental i…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal brings before the court a conviction of appellant for a September, 1959, housebreaking adjudged by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Two grounds for reversal are urged.

First. Was there sufficient evidence of defendant’s insanity at the time of the alleged crime to require that a requested and refused instruction on insanity should have been given ?

There was testimony that defendant “was registered as an active patient” at the District Child Guidance Clinic from July 29, 1952, through November 16, 1954, and also testimony of actions when drinking “different from what other people would do” in the same condition. Testimony was admitted that a recent mental hospital report showed no mental defect existing about the time of the charged act.

Second. Refusal of the trial court to permit certain records of the Bureau of Mental Health containing a psychiatric prognosis as to appellant’s sanity made by a physician who has since died, to be introduced into evidence, or to be used as the basis for opinion testimony by another physician.

We conclude that the first ground requires a reversal. A defendant on a criminal charge is entitled to an in-» struetion on mental capacity if competent evidence is introduced of impaired mentality. The testimony referred to above requires in this jurisdiction an instruction on insanity. Tatum v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 386, 389, 190 F. 2d 612, 615.

As another trial may again raise the question as to the introduction of the records of the Bureau of Mental Health, we add that these records, by reason of a controlling opinion of this court, are not admissible either directly or indirectly through the testimony of another physician. Lyles v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 28, 254 F. 2d 725, 731, certiorari denied 356 U.S. 961, 78 S.Ct. 997, 2 L.Ed.2d 1067.

Judgment reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw