UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
RIDDICK BROWN, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
RIDDICK BROWN, APPELLANT
285 F.2d 528
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, convicted of theft of government property, complains of the court’s charge. He says that the court emphasized -the elements of the offense, particularly by defining the element of asportation. The District Judge was required to do so, and his definition of asportation was extremely pertinent in light of the emphasis by the defense upon the fact that the property had not been removed from the Navy Yard.
There is no contention that the charge was in any way incorrect. We have reviewed the entire charge and find it to be fair, balanced and unobjectionable.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Cabbell, 427 F.2d 147 (4th Cir. 1970)
-
Rainwater v. United States, 443 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1971)