ALFRED GENE WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
HURETTA MOSS WRIGHT, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In a dissolution of marriage case, the husband appealed a judgment awarding the wife partial attorney's fees and the husband's home equity as lump sum alimony. The appellate court affirmed because the statement of evidence submitted in lieu of a trial transcript was inadequate for appellate review, as the trial judge could not settle all relevant factual disputes.
A statement of evidence may be substituted for a transcript of proceedings only when all relevant factual disputes have been settled and the statement is approved by the lower tribunal. When the trial court specifically states it cannot settle all relevant factual disputes, the statement does not constitute a complete and adequate record for appellate review.
[1] The granting or withholding of specific performance and the application of the clean hands doctrine are questions for the lower court whose determination and discretion w…
[2] A party seeking to appeal a judgment without a trial transcript bears the burden of demonstrating error from the record, which they must supply.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“It is well established that the findings and judgment of the trial court comes to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in the absence of a record demonstrating error.”
Establishes the standard of review and the presumption in favor of trial court judgments
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe trial court dissolved a marriage and awarded the wife partial attorney's fees and designated the husband's interest in the marital home as lump su…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Correctness Of Trial Court Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.
The husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution which awarded the wife partial attorney’s fees and the husband’s interest in the marital home as lump sum alimony. The question is whether the statement of the evidence submitted in lieu of the transcript of the hearing is sufficient for purposes of appellate review. We hold that it is not and affirm.
The trial in this cause was not transcribed. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) provides the procedures to be followed where no transcript of the proceedings is available:
If no report of the proceedings was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, the appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means, including his recollection. The statement shall be served on the appellee, who may serve objections or proposed amendments thereto within 10 days of service. Thereafter, the statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the lower tribunal for settlement and approval. As settled and approved, the statement shall be included by the clerk of the lower tribunal in the record.
Pursuant to this rule, the husband prepared a statement of the evidence. The wife filed her objections to the evidence and proposed amendments to the statement. The statement, objections and amendments were then submitted to the trial court for settlement and approval.
In attempting to reconstruct the evidence, the judge observed that the trial was held more than five months ago, and that he had virtually no recollection of the testimony independent of his notes. As a consequence, the judge stated that he could only settle certain factual disputes.
It is well established that the findings and judgment of the trial court comes to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in the absence of a record demonstrating error. Mills v. Heenan, 382 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). It is equally well established that the burden is on the appellant to bring before the appellate court a record adequate to support his appeal. Id. We believe that a statement of evidence as provided in rule 9.200(b)(3) may be substituted for a report or transcript of the proceedings only when all relevant factual disputes have been settled and the statement of evidence is approved by the lower tribunal. When the trial court specifically states that it cannot settle all relevant factual disputes, the statement of evidence does not constitute a complete and adequate record for appellate review. We therefore have no alternative but to affirm the judgment below.
We also take this opportunity to reiterate what our sister court in Gordon v. Burke, 429 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) recently observed: if a case is considered worthy of litigating, it follows that the testimony adduced before the trier of fact should be reported and transcribed so that the appellate court could have before it a record for its consideration in the event an appeal is deemed necessary.
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (59 total)
-
Polizzi v. Polizzi, 600 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…ut we should not do so on an ad hoc basis. . Vandergriff v. Vandergriff, 456 So. 2d 464 (Fla.1984); McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Development Co., 576 So. 2d 933 (Fla.5th DCA 1991); Boylan v. Boylan, 571 So. 2d 580 (Fla.4th DCA 1990); Wright v. Wright, 431 So. 2d 177 (Fla.5th DCA 1983). . Blue Lakes Apartments v. George Gowing, Inc., 464 So. 2d 705 (Fla.4th DCA 1985); Lurio v. Lurio, 443 So. 2d 197 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); Arnold v. Taco Properties, Inc., 427 So. 2d 216 (Fla.1st DCA 1983). . Plaza Builders v. Regis,…
-
BEI v. Harper, 475 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…n comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Second, that appellant has the burden to submit to the appellate court a record adequate to support the appeal. Wright v. Wright, 431 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). The creation of Rule 9.200(f)(2), which became effective on March 1, 1978, did not abolish the appellant’s burden. As the 1977 Advisory Committee and Court’s Commentary noted, the purpose of the rule is to assure portions of the…
-
Carter v. Carter, 504 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…r by a transcript of testimony or a stipulated statement, then we cannot fault and reverse a trial judge for a purported error. It is the appellant’s burden to submit to the appellate court a record adequate to support the appeal. Wright v. Wright, 431 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Where the nature of the appeal requires that the record include the testimony, where it is not available we will either dismiss the appeal or summarily affirm the order appealed from. Beasley. Appellant’s contention that Rule 9…
Previewing 3 of 59 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mills v. Heenan, 382 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Gordon v. Burke, 429 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)