CHARLES P. GROSS, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT C. WATSON, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, APPELLEE
CHARLES P. GROSS, APPELLANT,
ROBERT C. WATSON, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, APPELLEE
288 F.2d 169
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit to obtain a patent. We re-affirm all that we said in Schafer v. Watson, - U.S.App.D.C. - , 288 F. 2d 144.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE v. Flintkote Co., 593 F.2d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
-
Tuxedo Contractors v. Swindell-Dressler Co., 613 F.2d 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
-
Emery L. Parks v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 416 F.2d 833 (7th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gustav Schafer v. Watson, 288 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1961)