J. C. GREELEY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF EMMA REGISTER, DECEASED, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ELIZABETH A. HENDRICKS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This equity case concerns the right to partition land inherited from William T. Hendricks. The Florida Supreme Court reversed the lower court's order sustaining a plea in abatement because the administrator of a deceased complainant's estate lacks standing to maintain a partition suit, and no proper parties remained to prosecute the action.
An administrator, not being an owner, joint tenant, tenant in common, or co-parcener within the meaning of the statute, cannot maintain a suit for partition. The administrator lacks the necessary standing to prosecute such an action, and when the original complainant dies and no proper parties remain, the lower court's order must be reversed.
“while an administrator may, under our statute, maintain an action of ejectment upon the title of an intestate and recover possession of land, yet that not being an owner, joint tenant, tenant in common or co-parcener, within the meaning of the statute, he cannot maintain suit for partition”
Establishes that administrators lack standing to bring partition suits despite their authority to bring ejectment actions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMrs. Register and her husband William Register brought an equity suit to partition land owned by William T. Hendricks, claiming Mrs. Register was enti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justicb Raney
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a suit in equity for the partition of lands. The bill was brought by Mrs. Register, who has since died intestate, and her husband, "William Register, against the appellee, who is the widow of William T. Hendricks, deceased, and other defendants. Mrs. Register was the daughter of William T. Hendricks and appellee. The claim made by the bill is that Mrs. Register, in her own right, was entitled to one-sixth interest in the land, as one of the heirs of her father, who died in February, 1873, owning and occupying the land, and that such land comprised all the land or estate which he owned on April 7th, 1852. It states the value of the land as of the date just mentioned, and prays that the share claimed by Mrs. Register be set apart and confirmed to her by decree of the court, and for general relief. Mrs. Hendricks filed a plea setting up a conveyance of the land in fee on said April 7, 1852, directly to her by her husband, a record of the deed of conveyance in the same month, and continued seisin since, excepting certain parts she has since sold. After the filing of this plea Mrs. Register died, and Greeley was appointed administrator of her estate, and made a party complainant, and afterwards the said plea adjudged to be sufficient.
This court decided in Whitlock vs. Williard, 18 Fla., 156, that while an administrator may, under our statute, maintain an action of ejectment upon the title of an intes" tate and recover possession of land, yet that not béing an owner, joint tenant, tenant in common or co-parcener, within the meaning of the statute, he cannot maintain suit for partition. The administrator, Mr. Greeley, cannot, therefore, maintain .this suit for partition. It is clear that Mr. Register was made a party simply as co-complainant with his wife in her right, 'and has no other status on the pleadings. Eo.proceedings have been taken by him to revive the suit as her heir, even if he be her sole heir. The consequence is that there were no proper parties complainant before the court when the. order on the plea was made, and for this reason such order is reversed, and the cause will be remanded for such proceedings as may be proper.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rawls v. Tallahassee Hotel Co., 43 Fla. 288 (Fla. 1901)…as a [*297] necessary indispensable party the decree should be reversed. Craver v. Spencer, 40 Fla. 135, 23 South. Rep. 880; Nelson v. Haisley, 39 Fla. 145, 22 South. Rep. 265; Lyon v. Register, 36 Fla. 273, 18 South. Rep. 589; Greeley v. Hendricks, 23 Fla. 366, 2 South. Rep. 620; Wykes v. Ringleberg, 49 Mich. 567, 14 N. W. Rep. 498; Beasley v. Shively, 20 Oregon, 508, 26 Pac. Rep. 846. This defect as to parties renders it improper for this court to consider other questions involved. The (decree appealed…
-
Terrell v. Weymouth, 32 Fla. 255 (Fla. 1893)
-
Lyon v. Register, 36 Fla. 273 (Fla. 1895)…he name of Mrs. Register in her life-time, and she having died pending the suit, J - C. Gfreeley was made her administrator. The result of the attempt to carry on the suit in the administrator’s name is recorded in the case of Greeley vs. Hendricks, 23 Fla. 366, 2 South. Rep. 620. In that case it was held, as it had been decided before in Whitlock vs. Willard, 18 Fla. 156, that an administrator can not maintain a suit for partition of land under the statutes of this State. In proceedings simply to partiti…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Whitlock v. Willard, 18 Fla. 156 (Fla. 1881)