NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
GRUNWALD-MARX, INC., RESPONDENT
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
GRUNWALD-MARX, INC., RESPONDENT
290 F.2d 210
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We decline to enforce the board’s proposed order. While one single isolated instance of a threat may be enough for an unfair labor practice under section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 158(a) (1), yet the vice president’s purported threat shows no course of conduct and in the frame of the events is such that we can only regard it as de minimis.
The weakness of the case is well illustrated by the hearing examiner's conclusion that there was no threat of reprisal or force or a promise of benefit and he found support in the dissent of one member of the board.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tex-Tan, Inc., 318 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1963)
-
The J. S. Dillon & Sons Stores Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 338 F.2d 395 (10th Cir. 1964)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Barney's Supercenter, Inc., 296 F.2d 91 (3d Cir. 1961)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence