JOSEPH DE LUCA, APPELLANT
v.
ROBERT B. ANDERSON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL., APPELLEES
JOSEPH DE LUCA, APPELLANT
ROBERT B. ANDERSON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, ET AL., APPELLEES
293 F.2d 852
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 38 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant seeks reinstatement to his former post in the Internal Revenue Service. We have considered the contentions advanced by appellant, but are satisfied he received all the procedural rights accorded him by statute and regulation. We find no error “cognizable within the scope of permissible review,” Hargett v. Summerfield, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 88, 243 F. 2d 29, 32, certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 970, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1137 (1957). The order of the District Court, granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment, will accordingly be
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Gonzalez v. Freeman, 334 F.2d 570 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
-
Carter v. Seamans, 411 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1969)
-
Beard v. Stahr, 370 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1962)
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Newell M. Hargett v. Summerfield, 243 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
- Hargett v. Summerfield, 353 U.S. 970 (U.S. 1957)