WILLIAM VAN POYCK, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Inmate Van Poyck appeals from the Commission’s order of October 22, 1982 declining to review errors which he alleged were committed during the Commission’s establishment of his presumptive parole release date in 1980. We affirm.
Van Poyck sought administrative review following his biennial interview in July 1982 of matters that were raised, or could have been raised, on appeal of his PPRD two years before. A biennial review may not be used for this purpose. See Broxson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 425 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Cook v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 423 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Sheets v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 423 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
ERVIN, WENTWORTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Donnie Bullard v. State, 436 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…quate, if conducted properly. Defense counsel did object to the admission of hearsay in the form of statements of an absent witness presented to the jury through the testimony of a police officer. That testimony was inadmissible. Driessen v. State, 431 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Cox v. State, 394 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Although the trial court erred in admitting the testimony, the error must be deemed harmless in light of the three eyewitness identifications presented to the jury. For these rea…
Authorities Cited
- Elzie Cook v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 423 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Broxson v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 425 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Jethro Sheets v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 423 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)