ROY Y. SANDERS, JR., APPELLANT
v.
DAVID L. LADD, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, APPELLEE

D.C. Cir. | 1961-06-29
No. 16225
Before Edgerton, Washington and Burger, Circuit Judges.
294 F.2d 231 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1961)
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is a patent case, under 35 U.S.C. § 145. Plaintiff-appellant’s application, Serial No. 333,147, covered a marked pharmaceutical tablet and the process of marking such a tablet. Though the plaintiff seems to have met a business need, and his process has achieved financial success, we are not convinced that the Patent Office and the District Court were wrong in holding that the application did not disclose patentable invention over the prior art. See Schafer v. Watson, 1961, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 288 F. 2d 144.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (12 total)

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw