NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
SIDNEY SELTZER AND RALPH SELTZER D/B/A G. & S. ELECTRIC COMPANY, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
The Board’s decision and order are reported in 130 N. L. R. B. No. 73. The Board found that the respondent had violated Sections 8(a) (1) and (5) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1, 5) and ordered it to cease and desist from such unfair labor practices and take specified affirmative action. The respondent filed no brief in opposition to the petition but Mr. Sidney Seltzer, who is not a lawyer, appeared on oral argument and stated that he and his partner had complied with the Board’s order and were unable to ascertain from the Board in what respect it claimed they had not complied. When asked by the court how an order of enforcement would be harmful if the respondent had already complied with the Board’s order, he replied that it would not be harmful.
In N. L. R. B. v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 179 F. 2d 221 it was held that the court need not refuse enforcement because, pendente lite, the original dispute has been settled. This decision was cited with approval in N. L. R. B. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567, 70 S.Ct. 826, 833, 94 L.Ed. 1067. Accordingly, the petition for enforcement is granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Erling David Larsen v. Gen. Motors Corp., 391 F.2d 495 (8th Cir. 1968)
-
Evans v. Gen. Motors Corp., 359 F.2d 822 (7th Cir. 1966)
-
Shellie Dagley v. The Armstrong Rubber Co. & Armstrong Rubber Mfg. Co., 344 F.2d 245 (7th Cir. 1965)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1950)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 179 F.2d 221 (2d Cir. 1950)