UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
LEONARD MALUGIN AND CHARLES FRED MCCORD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

6th Cir. | 1961-12-15
No. 14618
Before MARTIN, WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
296 F.2d 741 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the convictions and sentences, agreeing with the District Court's reasoning.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendants were convicted of violating federal statutes after a jury trial waiver. They appealed, challenging the validity of the search warrant used …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

The defendants in this case have appealed from judgments of conviction and sentence pronounced by District Judge William E. Miller, trial by jury having been waived by the defendants. They were convicted of violating Sections 5008 (b) and 5686(b) of Title 26 U.S.C.A. The case was submitted to our court on the record and the respective briefs of the United States Attorney and attorney for appellants, without oral argument. The points raised were that the District Court should have sustained the motion of appellants to suppress the evidence for lack of probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant; on the further ground that the warrant was insufficient on its face; and, finally, on the ground that the property seized was not that described in the search warrant. The District Court, in its well-reasoned opinion with appropriate citation of authority, 200 F.Supp. 764, overruled these contentions.

We are in accord with the reasoning of the United States District Court in its opinion. Accordingly, its judgment of conviction and sentence as to, each defendant is affirmed.

It is so ordered.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw