WILLIE J. ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-05-10
No. 82-2342
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
431 So. 2d 1037 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Topics
Anders V. California Procedure Frivolous Appeal

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bailey v. Scutieri, 759 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
    …fendant files any pleading to merits of the case the defendant waives all challenges to service of process or jurisdiction. See Babcock v. Whatmore, 707 So. 2d 702 (Fla.1998); Sternberg v. Sternberg, 139 Fla. 219, 190 So. 486 (1939); Hager v. Illes, 431 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Fundaro v. Canadiana Corp., 409 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Royal Indus., Inc. v. Birdsong, 340 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Krasnosky v. Krasnosky, 282 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). By filing pleadings for affirmative…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw