INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., OWNER OF THE S.S. NATALIE, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
STATES MARINE LINES, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND ARROW STEAMSHIP CO., INC., RESPONDENT
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., OWNER OF THE S.S. NATALIE, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
STATES MARINE LINES, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND ARROW STEAMSHIP CO., INC., RESPONDENT
297 F.2d 249
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order is so clearly correct that it would have been affirmed at the conclusion of the arguments, except for a question as to whether it was an appealable order. Farr & Co. v. Cia Intercontinental De Navegacion, 2 Cir., 243 F. 2d 342 disposes of that question. Order affirmed on Judge Murphy’s opinion, 200 F.Supp. 88.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chatham Shipping Co. v. Fertex S.S. Corp., 352 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1965)
-
Cnty. OF Durham v. Richards & Assocs., Inc., 742 F.2d 811 (4th Cir. 1984)
Authorities Cited
- Farr & Co. v. CIA. Intercontinental de Navegacion de Cuba, 243 F.2d 342 (2d Cir. 1957)