W. GARRETT GRAINGER, JR., AND LILLIAN R. GRAINGER, APPELLANTS,
v.
FREDERICK H. HOPE, APPELLEE
W. GARRETT GRAINGER, JR., AND LILLIAN R. GRAINGER, APPELLANTS,
FREDERICK H. HOPE, APPELLEE
432 So. 2d 77
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. See Schmidt v. Bowl America Florida, Inc., 358 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).
HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and ANDREWS, ROBERT LANCE, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Watson v. State, 636 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…like State v. Starke, 550 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), because the officer there did not stop the defendant until he had seen the contraband. Here, the officer effected the stop before seeing any contraband. This case is also unlike State v. Dara, 432 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), because there the officer was highly trained and experienced in narcotics arrests, knew the area as one of high drug usage, and saw an exchange of money for a brown grocery bag that was “sniffed.” By contrast, Officer Sigenell w…
-
Moore v. State, 579 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…three small plastic bags containing powdered cocaine. The state argues that this stop was valid because conduct innocent in the eyes of the untrained individual may create valid suspicion in the mind of a trained police officer. See State v. Dara, 432 So. 2d 77, 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). While there may be such cases, in this case the activities of the two men could create no more than a simple hunch in the mind of a trained police officer. We cannot distinguish this case from Peabody v. State, 556 So. 2d 82…
Authorities Cited
- Schmidt v. Bowl Am. Fla., Inc., 358 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)