GUILLERMO CORTEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Goodwin v. BLU Murray Ins. Agency, Inc., 939 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …ility would assert his or her rights and whether the person sought to be held liable is injured or prejudiced by the delay. This subsection shall not affect application of laches at an earlier time in accordance with law. See also Engle v. Acopian, 432 So. 2d 113, 115-16 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Thus, the court erred in denying Goodwin an accounting based on laches and estoppel. The elements of laches were not met. Like waiver, laches is also an affirmative defense. As such, the burden of proof is on the indivi…
• Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 511 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …tima, S.A. Panama v. Logothetis, 378 So. 2d 1336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Monroe v. Dixon, 152 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Even if she had a claim, the transaction occurred in 1969 and any relief is barred by the doctrine of lach-es. Engle v. Acopian, 432 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); City of Miami v. Gates, 393 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Therefore for the reasons above stated,3 the final judgment under review is affirmed. Affirmed. . Part of the wife’s assets are in blue-chip securities or other liqui…
• Corinthian Invs., Inc. v. Reeder, 555 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …. 446, 448 (1984). That uncertainty included whether with regard to a particular equitable action like that involved here there exists, within the meaning of section 95.11(6), a “legal action[] concerning the same subject matter.” Engle v. Acopian, 432 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), appears to have been read as having interpreted section 95.11(6) to mean that the expiration of a statute of limitations period governing a legal action which is analogous to the equitable action in issue bars the equitable acti…

Authorities Cited

• Blair v. State, 406 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1981)
• Tresvant v. State, 396 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)