UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
BRUCE BARNES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury under a one-count indictment charging a conspiracy to violate the Internal Revenue Laws dealing with distilled spirits, in violation of Section 371, Title 18 U.S. Code. No evidence was offered by appellant. He received a sentence of four years imprisonment.
The Court, being of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction of such offense, it is ordered that the judgment be reversed and the case remanded to the District Court for entry of judgment of acquittal. Rule 29 (a), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.; United States v. Gardner, 171 F. 2d 753, 759, C.A. 7th; Carr v. United States, 278 F. 2d 702, C.A. 6th.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (U.S. 1967)
-
Whitus v. Balkcom, 333 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1964)
-
United States v. Barnes, 319 F.2d 290 (6th Cir. 1963)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Gardner, 171 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1948)
- Carr v. United States, 278 F.2d 702 (6th Cir. 1960)